In a year that was anticipated to bring a new era of political stability with the interim government, Bangladesh is grappling with familiar challenges. A recent report from the Human Rights Support Society (HRSS) paints a bleak picture of the country’s political landscape, revealing that 160 individuals lost their lives and over 8,000 were injured in 1,047 incidents of political violence within just 13 months, spanning from September 2024 to September 2025.
The report highlights a recurring pattern in Bangladesh. Out of the fatalities, 104 were linked to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), 38 to the Awami League (AL), and others associated with smaller parties like Jamaat-e-Islami and the United People’s Democratic Front (UPDF). Alarmingly, 88 deaths resulted from clashes within the parties, indicating internal power struggles escalating to deadly outcomes.
The HRSS report underscores a disturbing trend of escalating political casualties: 82 deaths in 2021, 92 in 2022, 96 in 2023, and a significant jump to 160 between September 2024 and September 2025. These figures are more than just numbers; they epitomize a political environment desensitized to violence.
Over the years, political discourse has been overshadowed by animosity. Political rivals treat competition as warfare, prioritizing street dominance over fair elections or policy debates. This aggressive approach has led to frequent confrontations during elections, protests, and disagreements, diminishing the space for constructive dialogue.
The normalization of violence is a deeply concerning aspect. Rather than a breakdown of the political system, violence is increasingly viewed as an essential tool. Party members are mobilized as combatants, and the youth are indoctrinated to see confrontation as a display of loyalty. This shift in political engagement from dialogue to aggression is evident from city streets to university campuses.
This normalization thrives in an environment of impunity, where justice institutions are perceived as biased and selective in holding perpetrators accountable. This cycle of violence erodes public trust, fosters cynicism, and promotes the notion that power stems from intimidation rather than integrity.
Addressing this entrenched culture of violence necessitates more than temporary peace before elections; it requires a fundamental overhaul. Political leaders must publicly denounce violence and enforce disciplinary measures within their parties. Law enforcement and the judiciary must act impartially, free from political influence. Independent oversight, civic education, and youth empowerment programs are vital in combating this issue.
Bangladesh must not accept political violence as a routine aspect of democracy. The true essence of democracy lies in civil disagreement, not violent clashes. As the nation looks towards future transitions, a decision must be made to break free from the cycle of violence and embrace a path of reform, restraint, and respect for life. Genuine political strength arises from dialogue, compromise, and leadership devoid of bloodshed. Bangladesh aspires for a political era that heals wounds rather than inflicting new ones.