The recent Bonn Climate Change Conference (SB 62) was a significant moment for the climate justice movement, highlighting key issues but falling short of expected breakthroughs. The conference shed light on the challenges surrounding gender justice and finance for Loss and Damage (L&D), underscoring the ongoing disparities in global climate governance.
Women, especially those from Indigenous, Global South, and marginalized communities, bear the brunt of climate impacts, including disrupted livelihoods, food and water insecurity, and displacement. Despite this, their meaningful involvement in decision-making processes and financial mechanisms remains limited and often symbolic.
During SB 62, the new Gender Action Plan (GAP) drafting process was initiated, building on the Lima Work Programme on Gender (LWPG). Discussions emphasized the need for gender-responsive actions leading up to COP 30 in Belém, Brazil, with a focus on intersectionality, structural barriers, and marginalized groups. However, challenges arose as certain countries resisted inclusive gender definitions, while others advocated for rights-based frameworks. The structural exclusion of women was evident, with only around 35 percent of Bonn delegates being women, many lacking decision-making authority due to various barriers.
Finance discussions at the conference also fell short of expectations, with mentions of gender-responsive budgeting and funding access lacking concrete commitments or financial allocations. Without tangible support for grassroots and women-led initiatives, the GAP risks remaining aspirational rather than impactful.
Loss and Damage (L&D) took center stage at Bonn, reflecting the escalating climate crisis. Developing nations called for clarity, urgency, and increased support, while developed countries exhibited hesitancy.
Key outcomes of the conference included advancements in the review of the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM), acknowledging a significant finance gap, discussions on integrating L&D into reporting mechanisms, and proposals for substantial international climate finance. However, concrete commitments and binding pathways were notably absent.
While progress was made in recognizing intersectional issues and elevating L&D concerns, challenges such as underrepresentation and inadequate funding persist. The need for inclusive gender definitions and robust financial backing is crucial for effective climate action and meeting the 1.5 degrees Celsius goal.
The upcoming COP 30 in Belém, Brazil, presents a critical opportunity to address mounting finance commitments, enhance gender justice, and ensure meaningful participation. These include capitalizing the Fund for Responding to Loss & Damage, integrating L&D into climate goals, and fostering inclusive gender definitions and financial support. Enabling participation entails providing necessary resources for women’s engagement and leadership roles, emphasizing decision-making authority over token representation.
The urgency for action is underscored by the real-world impacts of climate change, with communities already facing displacement and loss. Belém will be a pivotal moment to either advance justice or maintain the status quo.
In Bangladesh, a model emphasizing grant-based L&D funding showcases how international commitments can translate into tangible community outcomes. However, global efforts must align to support those most affected by climate change.
Gender justice and Loss and Damage are critical issues reaching a tipping point. The decisions made in Belém will determine whether progress is achieved or opportunities are missed.
The opinions expressed in this article reflect the author’s perspective. For more insights and expert analyses, follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook.